TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moyer v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC.

Charles MOYER and Donna Moyer; Individually and as Personal Representatives of the Estates of Judy and Ronald Moyer; And Leisurecraft, Inc., Petitioners v. TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, INC., Teledyne Inc., Superiorair Parts, Inc., Piedmont Hawthorne Aviations, Inc. A/K/A Piedmont Aviation Services, Inc., Piedmont/Hawthorne Aviation, Inc., and/or Piedmont Hawthorne Aviation, LLC., and Divco, Inc., Respondents

Moyer v. Teledyne Cont'l Motors, Inc., 11 A.3d 960 (Pa. 2011)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 25, 2011
Docket
No. 450 EAL 2009
Judges
Madame, Melvin
Citations
11 A.3d 960608 Pa. 3852011 Pa. LEXIS 181

Opinion — Per Curiam

ORDER PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 25th day of January, 2011, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the following issue, as stated by Petitioners:

Did the Superior Court improperly afford blanket immunity to manufacturers for negligence and strict liability in their written instructions under GARA’s rolling provision under the guise of fostering a non-existent federal policy to vindicate rights of manufacturers over those of accident victims?

The Application for Leave to File Reply to The Answers of Respondents is hereby denied as moot.

Madame Justice Orie Melvin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Oliver v. City of Pittsburgh, 11 A.3d 960 (Pa. 2011) 90

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list