Orval Wyse, Dba Wyse Brothers Turkey Farm, Bankrupt (Two Cases). A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company v. Willard A
In the Matter of Orval Wyse, Dba Wyse Brothers Turkey Farm, Bankrupt (Two Cases). A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company v. Willard A. MacK Trustee in Bankruptcy, Archbold Seed & Grain Company v. Willard A. MacK Trustee in Bankruptcy
Opinion
296 F.2d 214
In the Matter of Orval WYSE, dba Wyse Brothers Turkey Farm, Bankrupt (two cases). A. E. STALEY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Appellant, v. Willard A. MACK, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellee. ARCHBOLD SEED & GRAIN COMPANY, Appellant, v. Willard A. MACK, Trustee in Bankruptcy, Appellee.
No. 14491.
No. 14492.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
November 24, 1961.
John B. Spitzer, Toledo, Ohio (Marshall, Melhorn, Bloch & Belt, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for A. E. Staley Mfg. Co.
Howard C. Cook, Toledo, Ohio (Cline, Bischoff & Cook, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for Archbold Seed & Grain Company.
Robert B. Gosline, Toledo, Ohio (Arthur S. Newcomer of Newcomer & Shaffer, Bryan, Ohio; and Robert B. Gosline of Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, Toledo, Ohio, on the brief), for Willard A. Mack.
Before MARTIN, Circuit Judge, SIMONS, Senior Judge, and CECIL, Circuit Judge.
ORDER.
1
The questions presented by these appeals from the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio are: 1. Whether a fund of $376,100.34 derived from the sale of about 100,000 turkeys is the property of the bankrupt, Orval Wyse, or the property of a partnership, consisting of the bankrupt and Archbold Seed and Grain Company; and, 2. Did the District Court err in not vacating its judgment of February 23, 1960, and in not permitting Archbold Seed and Grain Company to file an answer?
2
Upon careful consideration of all matters presented on the appeals, the Court finds that there is no substantial evidence to support the claim of a partnership between Orval Wyse and Archbold Seed and Grain Company; and, it further finds that the facts as found by the referee in bankruptcy and the inferences of facts drawn therefrom, as affirmed by the District Judge, are not clearly erroneous.
3
It is therefore ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgments of the District Court be and they are hereby affirmed, upon the findings of fact, conclusions of law and memorandum of the referee, and the memorandum of the District Judge on the petitions for review.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.