National Labor Relations Board v. W. Ralston & Company, Inc., and Technical Tape Corporation
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. W. RALSTON & COMPANY, Inc., and Technical Tape Corporation, Respondents
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of an order directing respondents to cease and desist from conduct violative of Section 8(a) (1)
1
2of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. The pertinent findings 2
are that respondent coercively interrogated individual employees about union activity, threatened to move the plant because of the union, granted wage increases in order to counteract union influence, and posted an unlawful no solicitation rule. Respondents’ sole challenge to these findings is that they are not supported by substantial evidence. Because we find substantial credible evidence in the record to support each finding, we must enforce. Universal Camera Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 340 U.S. 474 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); N. L. R. B. v. Syracuse Color Press, 209 F.2d 596 (2 Cir. 1954), cert. denied 347 U.S. 966 , 74 S.Ct. 777 , 98 L.Ed. 1108 (1954); N. L. R. B. v. Pratt, Read & Co., Inc., 191 F.2d 1006, 1009 (2 Cir. 1951); N. L. R. B. v. Pyne Molding Corp., 226 F.2d 818 (2 Cir. 1955); Republic Aviation Corp. v. N. L. R. B., 324 U.S. 793 , 65 S.Ct. 982 , 89 L.Ed. 557 (1945).
Enforcement granted.
1
. 29 U.S.C.A. § 158 (a) (1).
2
. Other findings were made as a result of a prior settlement agreement, but no specific challenge has been directed at them.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.