TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Estate of Leo P. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman, and Estate of Ida W. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

ESTATE of Leo P. KAUFMAN, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman, Executor, and Estate of Ida W. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman, Executor, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Estate of Leo P. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman, & Estate of Ida W. Kaufman, Deceased, Alph C. Kaufman v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 300 F.2d 128 (6th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 10, 1962
Docket
No. 14605
Judges
Cecil, Weick, Darr
Citations
300 F.2d 1289 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 900

Opinion

ORDER This action is before the Court on petition for review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States. Individual income taxes of Leo P. Kaufman in the amount of $1255.89 for the calendar year 1955 are involved.

The question presented is whether the taxpayer was entitled to exclude $5200 from his gross income for the year 1955 for “sick pay” under § 105 (d), Internal Revenue Code of 1954, (Sec. 105(d), Title 26 U.S.C.).

The case was submitted to the Court upon the record, the briefs of the parties and oral argument of counsel.

The facts which are not in dispute are accurately stated by Judge Bruce of the Tax Court and are reported in his Findings of Fact at 35 T.C. 663 .

Upon consideration of the record, briefs and oral arguments, we find that the inferences drawn from the undisputed facts are warranted and not clearly erroneous. This Court will not reverse on findings of fact or inferences drawn therefrom unless they are clearly erroneous. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 , 80 S.Ct. 1190 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1218 .

Upon examination and consideration of the applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 and the authorities cited, we conclude that Judge Bruce correctly interpreted and applied the law to the facts as reported in his opinion at 35 T.C. 665 .

For the reasons herein stated, it is ordered that the Decision of the Tax Court be and it is hereby affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 21 cases

View all citing references →
1963: 11965: 11966: 11967: 11968: 21969: 21970: 11971: 21972: 11973: 11975: 11976: 11983: 21987: 11994: 21996: 119632026peak 1968 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Seidel v. Commissioner1971 T.C. Memo. 238
  2. Pickle v. Commissioner1971 T.C. Memo. 304
  3. American Foundry v. Commissioner59 T.C. 231 (Tax Ct. 1972)
  4. Lang v. Commissioner41 T.C. 352 (Tax Ct. 1963)
  5. Larkin v. Commissioner48 T.C. 629 (Tax Ct. 1967)
  6. Stewart and Lillian Caplin v. United States718 F.2d 544 (2d Cir. 1983)

Most recent

  1. Hall v. Commissioner (In re Estate of Hall)1996 T.C. Memo. 93
  2. Frazier v. Commissioner1994 T.C. Memo. 358
  3. Burnside v. Commissioner1994 T.C. Memo. 138
  4. Gordon v. Commissioner88 T.C. No. 34
  5. Stewart and Lillian Caplin v. United States718 F.2d 544 (2d Cir. 1983)
  6. Wigutow v. Commissioner1983 T.C. Memo. 620

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Comm'r v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960) 1,312
Kaufman v. Comm'r, 35 T.C. 663 (Tax Ct. 1961) 23

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list