TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

James W. Hunt v. United States

James W. HUNT, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee

Hunt v. United States, 301 F.2d 663 (4th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
March 28, 1962
Docket
No. 8539_1
Judges
Soper, Haynsworth, Bell
Citations
301 F.2d 6631962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5553

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This petitioner was arrested and indicted for illegal possession and sale of narcotic drugs in the District of Columbia. He was tried in the District Court for the District of Columbia and was convicted in that court on November 7, 1957. He was sentenced to a maximum of twelve years imprisonment. Upon direct appeal from this conviction to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia he raised the issue of entrapment, and that court affirmed the conviction. Hunt v. United States, 103 U.S.App.D.C. 309 , 258 F.2d 161 (D.C.Cir.1958). He has been imprisoned since the date of conviction in the Federal Penitentiary for the District of Columbia in Lorton, Virginia.

In October of 1959 Hunt filed a motion to vacate judgment and sentence under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 in the District Court for the District of Columbia. That court denied the motion. Petitioner filed an application to appeal from that denial in forma pauperis. The District Court denied this application as frivolous and not in good faith. Petitioner’s appeal from this decision was dismissed as frivolous. The Supreme Court denied certiorari at 364 U.S. 943 , 81 S.Ct. 464 , 5 L.Ed.2d 374 (1961).

Hunt filed the present petition for writ of habeas corpus in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the place of his imprisonment. This was denied without a hearing in the court below.

We have examined at great length the many contentions contained in this prolix and inartistically drawn petition. We are satisfied that all of them may be raised by motion under Sec. 2255. Therefore, the District Court below was without jurisdiction to grant the writ. Morris v. United States, 254 F.2d 812 (4 Cir. 1958); Gaylord v. Clemmer, 242 F.2d 872 (4 Cir. 1957).

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1967: 11977: 11980: 11984: 11997: 119672026peak 1967 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States v. Billy G. Byers740 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Company567 F.2d 96 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  3. Boyer v. Conaboy983 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1997)
  4. United States v. Garcia501 F. Supp. 472 (D.P.R. 1980)
  5. Campbell v. Clark274 F. Supp. 556 (D. Minnesota 1967)

Most recent

  1. Boyer v. Conaboy983 F. Supp. 4 (D.D.C. 1997)
  2. United States v. Billy G. Byers740 F.2d 1104 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  3. United States v. Garcia501 F. Supp. 472 (D.P.R. 1980)
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Atlantic Richfield Company567 F.2d 96 (D.C. Cir. 1977)
  5. Campbell v. Clark274 F. Supp. 556 (D. Minnesota 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Hunt v. United States, 258 F.2d 161 (D.C. Cir. 1958) 7
Gaylord v. Clemmer, 242 F.2d 872 (4th Cir. 1957) 3
Morris v. United States, 254 F.2d 812 (4th Cir. 1958) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list