TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

J. C. Dulworth and Eva Dulworth v. United States of America, E. v

J. C. DULWORTH and Eva Dulworth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee; E. v. DULWORTH and Virginia Dulworth, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee

J. C. Dulworth & Eva Dulworth v. United States, E. v, 302 F.2d 266 (6th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
April 25, 1962
Docket
No. 14664_1
Judges
Cecil, O'Sullivan, Boyd
Citations
302 F.2d 266

Opinion

ORDER.

These cases are before the Court on appeals from orders of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division, dismissing complaints of the appellants in which they sought to recover income taxes paid on deficiency assessments alleged to have been erroneously made by the District Director of Internal Revenue.

The cases were tried in the District Court, to a judge thereof, who made comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law.

The questions presented in the trial court and in this court for review are whether partnerships alleged to have been made by taxpayers Eva Dulworth, E. V. Dulworth and J. C. Dulworth, as guardians and trustees on behalf of minor children, were in fact such partnerships or in reality partnerships of the taxpayers themselves.

The appeals were submitted on the records in the trial court and the briefs and oral arguments of counsel.

Upon consideration whereof, we find that the record amply supports the findings and conclusions of the trial judge and that his findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and that his conclusions of law are in accord with accepted legal principles. D.C., 203 F.Supp. 760 .

It is therefore ordered that the judgments of the District Court be and the same are hereby affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1966: 119662026peak 1966 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James D. Ballou and Sarah L. Ballou v. United States370 F.2d 659 (6th Cir. 1966)

Most recent

  1. James D. Ballou and Sarah L. Ballou v. United States370 F.2d 659 (6th Cir. 1966)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Dulworth v. United States, 203 F. Supp. 760 (W.D. Ky. 1961) 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list