TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Panama Canal Company v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, Inc., as Owner of the S.S. Robert Luckenbach, and as Bailee of the Cargo Laden Thereon

PANAMA CANAL COMPANY, Appellant, v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY, Inc., as Owner of the S.S. ROBERT LUCKENBACH, and as Bailee of the Cargo Laden Thereon, Appellee

Panama Canal Co. v. Luckenbach S.S. Co., 303 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 25, 1962
Docket
No. 19263_1
Judges
Tuttle, Rives, Jones
Citations
303 F.2d 2521962 A.M.C. 12551962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4994

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292 (b) by appellant from an order entered by the United States District Court of the Canal Zone denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the libel of the appellee as being barred by the two-year statute of limitations applicable to claims against the United States under the Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2401 (b). We granted the motion for interlocutory appeal because we considered that the final disposition of the litigation would be expedited thereby.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court on the well considered opinion of District Judge Crowe holding that the three-year statute of limitations contained in the Canal Zone Code, § 4-85 is applicable rather than the two-year statute contained in the Federal Tort Claims Act. We agree with the District Court that *253 claims against the Panama Canal Company are excluded from the provisions of the Tort Claims Act and that the limitation period contained in that Act has no application here.

The judgment is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1971: 11985: 11988: 119712026peak 1971 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list