TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hooper Webb v. Blount Memorial Hospital

Hooper WEBB, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BLOUNT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Defendant-Appellee

Hooper Webb v. Blount Mem'l Hosp., 303 F.2d 437 (6th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
May 9, 1962
Docket
No. 14713_1
Judges
Cecil, Boyd, Starr
Citations
303 F.2d 4371962 U.S. App. LEXIS 5169

Opinion

ORDER.

This action by plaintiff-appellant was brought in the District Court because of personal injuries resulting from alleged negligence of the defendant-appellee. Following a jury verdict for the plaintiff the trial court sustained defendant’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict on the ground that the operation of the defendant hospital is a governmental function of Blount County, a political subdivision of the State of Tennessee, and is, therefore, immune from liability for tort. Plaintiff is here on appeal from this ruling.

Defendant is a non-profit public welfare corporation organized under the laws of the State of Tennessee and owned by Blount County, Tennessee.

The question here is whether a corporation such as the defendant can be held liable in tort.

IT APPEARING that the district judge in his opinion ( 196 F.Supp. 114 , D.C.Tenn., 1961) reviewed the law of Tennessee relative to the facts herein and concluded on the basis of McMahon v. Baroness Erlanger Hospital, 43 Tenn.App. 128 , 306 S.W.2d 41, 1957 , and the cases cited therein, that a non-profit public welfare hospital corporation owned by a political subdivision of the State of Tennessee and operated as a governmental function of such subdivision was not liable for the torts of its agents, servants and employees; and IT FURTHER APPEARING after consideration of the record, arguments *438 and briefs of counsel that there is no reversible error in the action of the trial judge;

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11975: 11996: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wanda Cruise v. City of Columbia - Concurring922 S.W.2d 492 (Tenn. 1996)
  2. Lois Sawyer and David Sawyer v. Methodist Hospital522 F.2d 1102 (6th Cir. 1975)
  3. Sawyer v. Methodist Hospital of Memphis383 F. Supp. 563 (W.D. Tenn. 1974)

Most recent

  1. Wanda Cruise v. City of Columbia - Concurring922 S.W.2d 492 (Tenn. 1996)
  2. Lois Sawyer and David Sawyer v. Methodist Hospital522 F.2d 1102 (6th Cir. 1975)
  3. Sawyer v. Methodist Hospital of Memphis383 F. Supp. 563 (W.D. Tenn. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
McMahon v. Baroness Erlanger Hosp., 306 S.W.2d 41 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1957) 8
Webb v. Blount Mem'l Hosp., 196 F. Supp. 114 (E.D. Tenn. 1961) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list