TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Bentvena

United States v. William Bentvena, Carlie Dipietro, Carmine Galante, Angelo Loicano, Anthony Mirra, Samuel Monastersky, John Ormento, Carmine Panico, Salvatore Panico, Salvatore Sciremammano, and William Struzzieri

United States v. Bentvena, 304 F.2d 883 (2d Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
July 20, 1962
Docket
No. 27667_1
Citations
304 F.2d 8831962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4434

Opinion

304 F.2d 883

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. William BENTVENA, Carlie Dipietro, Carmine Galante, Angelo Loicano, Anthony Mirra, Samuel Monastersky, John Ormento, Carmine Panico, Salvatore Panico, Salvatore Sciremammano, and William Struzzieri, Appellants.

No. 400, Docket 27667.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued July 17, 1962. Decided July 20, 1962.

Albert J. Krieger, New York City, for appellants William Bentvena, Carlie Di-Pietro, Carmine Galante, Angelo Loicano, Samuel Monastersky, John Ormento, Salvatore, Sciremammano, and William Struzzieri.

William R. Luney, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, for appellant Anthony Mirra.

Jerome Lewis, New York City, for appellant Salvatore Panico.

Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for Southern Dist. of New York (Jonathan L. Rosner, Sheldon H. Elsen, Arnold N. Enker, Asst. U.S. Atty., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

In view of the early expiration of some of the sentences, we at this time dismiss the appeals of Bentvena, DiPietro, Loicano, Monastersky and Sciremammano as moot on the authority of United States v. Galante, 298 F.2d 72 (2 Cir.1962), and affirm the contempt convictions of Struzzieri, Galante, Mirra, Ormento and Carmine Panico. Decision with respect to the contempt conviction of Salvatore Panico is reserved for subsequent disposition.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1962: 11963: 11966: 11968: 11971: 119622026peak 1962 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Mirra v. United States255 F. Supp. 570 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)
  2. United States v. Salvatore Panico308 F.2d 125 (2d Cir. 1962)
  3. Panico v. United States291 F. Supp. 728 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)
  4. Ormento v. United States328 F. Supp. 246 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)
  5. United States v. Mirra220 F. Supp. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)

Most recent

  1. Ormento v. United States328 F. Supp. 246 (S.D.N.Y. 1971)
  2. Panico v. United States291 F. Supp. 728 (S.D.N.Y. 1968)
  3. Mirra v. United States255 F. Supp. 570 (S.D.N.Y. 1966)
  4. United States v. Mirra220 F. Supp. 361 (S.D.N.Y. 1963)
  5. United States v. Salvatore Panico308 F.2d 125 (2d Cir. 1962)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Galante, 298 F.2d 72 (2d Cir. 1962) 38

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list