TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Philip Y. Craig v. Alvin C

Craig v. Alvin C, 304 F.2d 954 (D.C. Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 21, 1962
Docket
No. 16467
Citations
304 F.2d 954113 U.S. App. D.C. 781962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4735

Opinion

304 F.2d 954 113 U.S.App.D.C. 78

Philip Y. CRAIG, Appellant, v. Alvin C. DOAK, Appellee. John T. COX and Alvin C. Doak, Appellants, v. Philip Y. CRAIG, Appellee.

Nos. 16465 and 16467.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued May 25, 1962. Decided June 21, 1962.

Appeals from the Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia; Andrew Hood, Judge.

1

Mr. Penrose Lucas Albright, Washington, D.C., for appellant in No. 16465 and appellee in No. 16467.

2

Mr. Louis M. Kaplan for appellant Cox in No. 16467.

3

No appearance or brief for appellant Doak in No. 16467.

4

Mr. William H. Collins, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U.S. Atty., and Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellees in No. 16465. Messrs. Charls T. Duncan, Principal Asst. U.S. Atty., and John R. Schmertz, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellee in No. 16465.

5

Before WASHINGTON, BURGER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

6

PER CURIAM.

7

Philip Y. Craig sued John T. Cox, a member of the police force of the Washington National Airport, for false arrest and imprisonment, and Alvin C. Doak, a member of the same police force, for assault and battery. After trial and judgment in the Municipal Court, the Municipal Court of Appeals reinstated a Jury verdict against Cox for false arrest, and directed a new trial for Doak, in a decision reported at 171 A.2d 259 (1961). Both Cox and Craig filed petitions for leave to appeal, which we granted. We have heard argument, and have carefully considered the contentions of the parties. Without necessarily agreeing with all that is said in the majority opinion of the Municipal Court of Appeals, we think that the result reached by that court was correct, and that its judgment should be Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Craig v. Cox, 171 A.2d 259 (D.C. 1961) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list