TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States v. Gilberto Santana

United States v. Santana, 306 F.2d 880 (2d Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 21, 1962
Docket
No. 27736
Citations
306 F.2d 880

Opinion

306 F.2d 880

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Gilberto SANTANA, Appellant.

No. 403.

Docket 27736.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued August 21, 1962.

Decided August 21, 1962.

Arnold Wallach, New York City (Harold O. N. Frankel, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Arthur I. Rosett, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, Robert J. Geniesse, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

We affirm the judgment of conviction. There was abundant evidence to support Judge Murphy's conclusion, sitting without a jury, that the appellant had control of the narcotics and his finding that the appellant was guilty as charged of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 , 174.

2

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list