TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Southern Pacific Company, a Corporation v. Sixto B. Villarruel

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. Sixto B. VILLARRUEL, Appellee

Southern Pac. Co., a Corp. v. Villarruel, 307 F.2d 414 (9th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 20, 1962
Docket
No. 17466_1
Judges
Orr, Hamley, Merrill
Citations
307 F.2d 4141962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4271

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

In this Federal Employers’ Liability Act case, a $30,000 judgment for plaintiff was entered on a jury verdict. Defendant Southern Pacific Company appeals, arguing that the district court erred in its instructions to the jury on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur.

Appellant contends that this instruction did not make it clear to the jury that res ipsa loquitur would not apply if carbon monoxide in any way contributed to the happening of the accident or the appellee’s injuries.

In our opinion the instruction initially given, as thereafter supplemented, did make this clear to the jury.

Appellant further contends that the instructions did not inform the jury that res ipsa loquitur could not be applied if the appellee’s conduct in any way contributed to the accident.

Counsel for appellant did not give this as a ground for objecting to the instruction on res ipsa loquitur.

Appellant is therefore precluded from obtaining a review of the instruction on that ground. Rule 51, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., Hargrave v. Wellman, 9 Cir., 276 F.2d 948, 950 .

If the point were now reviewable and if the instruction was inadequate in this regard, appellant was, in any event, not prejudiced. There was no evidence that Villarruel was negligent in the manner in which he dealt with the electrical equipment, thereby contributing to reception of the electrical shock. No error is committed by failure to give an instruction which finds no support in the evidence.

The only evidence as to contributory negligence was with regard to Villar-ruel’s possible carelessness in keeping the windows and doors of the generator room closed, thereby adding to the danger of inhaling carbon monoxide fumes. The jury having been correctly instructed not to consider the carbon monoxide aspect of the case in applying res ipsa loquitur, ap-pellee’s possible contributory negligence with regard to that aspect was likewise not to be considered.

The judgment is affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11969: 11978: 21979: 12001: 119632026peak 1978 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hargrave v. E. G. Wellman, 276 F.2d 948 (9th Cir. 1960) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list