TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Paul Handy Nunley v. United States District Judge Stephen S. Chandler

Paul Handy NUNLEY, Petitioner, v. United States District Judge Stephen S. CHANDLER, Respondent

Nunley v. United States Dist. Judge Stephen S. Chandler, 308 F.2d 223 (10th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
August 8, 1962
Docket
No. 7102_1
Judges
Murrah, Breitenstein
Citations
308 F.2d 2231962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4321

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an application to file, in forma pauperis, a Petition for Writ of Mandamus, to require Respondent to entertain a motion seeking a medical examination and to conduct a hearing thereon, to determine the mental competency of Petitioner, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4245 .

From an examination of the records of the United States District Court Clerk, Western District of Oklahoma, it appears that there has been no certification from the Director of the Bureau of Prisons that Petitioner “ * * * has been examined by the board of examiners * * * ” and that “ * * * there is probable cause to believe that such person was incompetent at the time of his trial.” See:

*224 18 U.S.C. § 4245 . In the absence of such -certification, Respondent lacked jurisdiction to conduct the hearing sought. See: United States v. Thomas, 6 Cir, 291 F.2d 478 .

Leave to proceed in forma pauperis is .accordingly denied and the case is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11964: 11966: 119632026peak 1963 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Herman Edward Nelms v. United States318 F.2d 150 (4th Cir. 1963)
  2. Paul Handy Nunley v. United States339 F.2d 442 (10th Cir. 1964)
  3. Paul Handy Nunley v. United States364 F.2d 825 (10th Cir. 1966)

Most recent

  1. Paul Handy Nunley v. United States364 F.2d 825 (10th Cir. 1966)
  2. Paul Handy Nunley v. United States339 F.2d 442 (10th Cir. 1964)
  3. Herman Edward Nelms v. United States318 F.2d 150 (4th Cir. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
United States v. Thomas, 291 F.2d 478 (6th Cir. 1961) 17

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list