Eddy v. Tops Friendly Markets
Elmer Eddy Et Al., Appellants, v. Tops Friendly Markets Et Al., Respondents
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 91 AD2d 1203 ; see, also, Madrid v City of New York, 42 NY2d 1039 ; and 1 NY PJI2d 274-275).
We do not reach and have not considered appellant’s argument, raised for the first time before us, that notice is not an element of an action against a self-service supermarket with respect to a fall caused by material in the aisle (see Ann., 85 ALR3d 1000).
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg, Meyer and Simons concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 64 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.