Lanzi v. Brooks
Joseph Lanzi, Appellant, v. Arthur Brooks, Respondent
Opinion
Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: "This determination is without prejudice to an application by appellant to Supreme Court for leave to serve an amended complaint, such application to include a copy of the proposed amended complaint accompanied by a disclosure of the evidentiary facts which would support the claim set forth in the proposed amended complaint and would justify the granting of such leave (cf. CPLR 3211, subd [d]).” [See 43 NY2d 778 .]
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.