St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, Respondent, v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellant
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
Although an insurance company in exclusive control of its insureds’ defense cannot be compelled to concede liability and settle a questionable claim before proof has been developed on all sides (e.g., Knoblock v Royal Globe Ins. Co., 38 NY2d 471 ), the defendant in this case refused to settle a claim in excess of its policy limits after liability had already been determined solely on factual issues by a jury (see Di Tomasso v Brookhattan Utilities, 40 AD2d 989 , mot for lv to app den 32 NY2d 609 ). Under these circumstances, with liability having been established at trial, the excess carrier alone was placed at further risk due to the defendant’s intractable opposition to any settlement of the claim.
Given a record which adequately supports these affirmed findings, amounting to a breach of the defendant’s implied *979 obligation to manage its insureds’ defense in good faith (see, e.g., Gordon v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 30 NY2d 427 , cert den 410 US 931 ; cf. Insurance Law, § 40-d, added by L 1970, ch 296, § 1), the imposition of liability for the excess judgment borne by the plaintiff was appropriate (see Kulak v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 40 NY2d 140 ;
Decker v Amalgamated Mut. Cas. Ins. Co., 35 NY2d 950 ).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 2 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.
-
(insurer has “implied obligation to manage its insureds’ defense in good faith”)
-
(where, after insured’s liability had been adjudged by jury, primary insurer acted in bad faith in refusing to settle claim for amount within its policy limits, thereby placing excess carrier alone at risk, excess carrier could recover against primary insurer)
Cited by 27 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals6
- Federal District Courts8
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts9
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- General Star National Insurance Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
- New England Insurance v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual Insurance
- New England Insurance Company v. Healthcare Underwriters Mutual Insurance Company
- Scottsdale Insurance v. Indian Harbor Insurance
- Pavia v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
- Schwartz v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
Most recent
- Wile v. James River Insurance Company
- Weathers v. Tri State Consumer Insurance Co.
- Vigilant Insurance Co. v. Travelers Property Casualty Co. of America
- Government Employees Insurance v. RLI Insurance
- Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National Insurance
- Scottsdale Insurance v. Indian Harbor Insurance
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.