TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Claytor v. WILMOT & CASSIDY, INC.

William Claytor, Appellant, v. Wilmot and Cassidy, Inc. Et Al., Respondents

Claytor v. Wilmot & Cassidy, Inc., 318 N.E.2d 607 (N.Y. 1974)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 18, 1974
Citations
318 N.E.2d 60734 N.Y.2d 992360 N.Y.S.2d 4171974 N.Y. LEXIS 1341

Opinion

On the court’s own motion, order of the Appellate Division will be affirmed, without costs, and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on his stipulation, unless within 30 days appellant makes application to withdraw the appeal herein, in which event leave to do so is hereby granted. The decision at the Appellate Division having been on the facts, this court would be bound in any event to affirm and render judgment absolute. (CPLR 5615; see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, pp. 295-296, 304-305.)

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1974: 11990: 12003: 119742026peak 1974 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Reyes v. Silfies168 A.D.2d 979 (1990)
  2. HAMM v. Regan318 N.E.2d 607 (N.Y. 1974)
  3. Duncan v. Perry307 A.D.2d 249 (2003)

Most recent

  1. Duncan v. Perry307 A.D.2d 249 (2003)
  2. Reyes v. Silfies168 A.D.2d 979 (1990)
  3. HAMM v. Regan318 N.E.2d 607 (N.Y. 1974)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Hamm v. Regan, 318 N.E.2d 607 (N.Y. 1974) 9

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list