Clarence J. Sapp and Hilda C. Sapp v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Clarence J. SAPP and Hilda C. Sapp, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This petition for review raises the question whether the Tax Court decision was clearly erroneous in finding that a portion of the automobile expense, including an allowance for -depreciation, claimed by the taxpayer as a deduction, was personal in nature and not deductible, where, in addition to using it in his medical practice, the taxpayer used the automobile to “commute” to work, to go home for lunch, and to attend social functions.
The facts are adequately set forth in the opinion of the Tax Court reported at 36 T.C. 852 . We conclude also that the reasoning and decision of the Tax Court is correct. That decision is, therefore, affirmed on the opinion of the Tax Court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 38 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.