Paul Tishman Co., Inc. v. Carney & Del Guidice, Inc.
Paul Tishman Company, Inc., Respondent, v. Carney & Del Guidice, Inc., Appellant
Opinion
Memorandum. In agreeing with the majority at the Appellate Division, we would merely add that defendant’s insurable interest under the fire insurance policies here in question was limited to its property interest in the building under construction —■ i.e., the tools, labor and material furnished or owned by the defendant: Since no part of the damages alleged by the *943 plaintiff in this litigation was for destruction of any property owned or furnished by the defendant, it cannot be said that the defendant was a coinsured under the terms of the policy with respect to the loss caused by the fire.
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Rabin concur in memorandum; Judge .Stevens taking no part.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 26 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- New York Board of Fire Underwriters v. Trans Urban Construction Co.
- Selective Way Ins. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.
- Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
- South Tippecanoe School Building Corp. v. Shambaugh & Son, Inc.
- Frank Briscoe Company, Inc. v. Georgia Sprinkler Company, Inc.
- S.S.D.W. Co. v. Brisk Waterproofing Co.
Most recent
- Garden City Apartments, LLC v. Xcel Plumbing of New York, Inc.
- Selective Way Ins. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. v. FD Sprinkler Inc.
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. L.E.S. Subsurface Plumbing Co.
- Lurgi Metallurgie GmbH v. Industrial Risk Insurers
- General Electric Co. v. Zurich-American Insurance
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.