Contracting Plumbers' Cooperative Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
Contracting Plumbers’ Cooperative Restoration Corporation, Appellant, v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Respondent
Contracting Plumbers' Coop. Restoration Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 387 N.E.2d 226 (N.Y. 1979)
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 59 AD2d 921 ), noting *859 that it is conceded that Interboro never performed any paving operations at the situs of the accidents.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.