Paul E. Rhodes v. Norval Houston
Paul E. RHODES, Appellant, v. Norval HOUSTON Et Al., Appellees
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska dismissing appellant’s complaint. The exhaustive opinion of the trial court (Judge Van Pelt) published at 202 F.Supp. 624 contains a careful and detailed analysis of the essential facts. Judge Van Pelt’s well considered conclusions, which we believe to be correct and with which we concur, are supported by a wealth of authority. On the basis of said opinion, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Also see: Kostal v. Stoner, 10 Cir., 292 F.2d 492 , certiorari denied 369 U.S. 868 , 82 S.Ct. 1032 , 8 L.Ed.2d 87 (4/30/62), rehearing denied 370 U.S. 920 , 82 S.Ct. 1559 , 8 L.Ed.2d 500 (6/11/62).
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 48 cases
View all citing references →- U.S. Courts of Appeals17
- Federal District Courts23
- Bankruptcy Courts2
- State Highest Courts2
- State Appellate Courts3
- State Trial Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
- Huey v. Barloga
- Conover v. Montemuro
- Wilhelm v. Turner
- Smallwood v. United States
- Peterson v. Knutson
- Henry Wilhelm and Lawrence Frank v. Richard C. Turner, Attorney General of Iowa Douglas Carlson, Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Blair, Director, Iowa Bureau of Criminal Investigation, Daniel Mayer and Terry C
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.