Caulfield v. Improved Risk Mutuals, Inc.
Harry Caulfield Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. Improved Risk Mutuals, Inc., Et Al., Respondents, and Hanover Insurance Company Et Al., Appellants
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT Order reversed, with costs, and judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, reinstated for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum of Justice Stewart F. Hancock, Jr., at the Appellate Division ( 107 AD2d 1013, 1014-1015 ). We agree with the dissent below that, based upon the specific provisions of the contract and the amendments made thereto, the risk of loss passed to the purchasers upon the date of the escrow closing.
*796 Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Kaye and Alexander. Judge Titone dissents and votes to affirm for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 107 AD2d 1013 ). Taking no part: Judge Simons.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.