People ex rel. Anonymous v. New York Foundling Hospital
The People of the State of New York Ex Rel. Anonymous, Appellant, v. New York Foundling Hospital, Respondent
Opinion
Per Curiam.
Sections 383 and 384 of the Social Welfare Law, read together, say that a parent who commits her child to an authorized agency by a voluntary, duly executed and acknowledged surrender instrument £i shall not be entitled to the custody ” of the child except on a court order “ determining that the interest of such child will be promoted thereby and that such parent is fit, competent and able to duly maintain, support and educate such child.” The surrender document here was voluntary and met all the statutory requirements. The courts below refused for sufficient reasons to make the factual determinations required to bring into operation the exception above quoted.
The situation, therefore, in this court is the familiar one where, since there is evidence to support the affirmed fact findings below, we have no power under our jurisdictional limitations to do anything except affirm.
Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster concur.
Order affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 8 cases
View all citing references →- Federal District Courts1
- State Highest Courts3
- State Appellate Courts1
- State Trial Courts2
- State Specialty Courts1
Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.