Pedro Arreche-Barcelona v. Immigration and Naturalization Service at Los Angeles, California
Pedro ARRECHE-BARCELONA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, Respondent
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of action of the Immigration Service. Having been subjected to a final order of deportation, petitioner applied for creation of status as a permanent resident on the basis of marriage to a United States citizen. This application was denied and the present petition for review was filed with this court under 75 Stat. 650 .
This court has taken the position that under 75 Stat. 650 we have original jurisdiction to review only final orders of deportation. Holz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1962, 309 F.2d 452 ; Mai Kai Fong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1962, 305 F.2d 239 ; Giova v. Rosenberg, 1962, 308 F.2d 347 .
*691 An order denying status is not such an order.
These proceedings therefore are dismissed without prejudice, however, to such right as petitioner may have to petition for review before the appropriate district court.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 4 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Victoria Marquez Talavera v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Afsaneh Sadegh-Nobari, Hossein Ghanavizchian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Shaffiq Kassab v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Ponciano Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Most recent
- Afsaneh Sadegh-Nobari, Hossein Ghanavizchian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Victoria Marquez Talavera v. Thomas M. Pederson, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Shaffiq Kassab v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
- Ponciano Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.