TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Paul Light and Margaret A. Light v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Paul LIGHT and Margaret A. Light, Petitioners, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Light v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue, 310 F.2d 716 (5th Cir. 1962)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
November 28, 1962
Docket
No. 19598_1
Judges
Hutcheson, Cameron, Jones
Citations
310 F.2d 71610 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 60251962 U.S. App. LEXIS 3480

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The Petitioner, Paul Light, here referred to as the taxpayer, was transferred by his employer from its office in New Orleans, Louisiana, to its office in Newark, New Jersey.. His family remained in New Orleans for nearly four months. During that period he made four trips to New Orleans to visit his family. Before moving his family from New Orleans, the taxpayer occupied a room at a hotel in Newark. By prearrangement, the taxpayer’s employer reimbursed him for his travel expenditures and for the cost incurred for meals and rooms in Newark prior to being joined by his family, and *717 for the hotel and meals of himself and his family for the few days between their arrival in Newark and their occupancy of a dwelling at that place. The taxpayer claimed deductions for the amount of the expenditures for which he had been reimbursed. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue disallowed the deductions and its action was sustained by the Tax Court. We are in agreement with the conclusion reached.

Expenses for travel, meals and lodging are not deductible unless incurred in connection with the performance of duties as an employee while away from home, and no deduction shall be allowed for personal, living or family expenses. 26 U.S.C.A. (I.R.C.1954) §§ 162, 262. The principles announced in Commissioner v. Flowers, 326 U.S. 465 , 66 S.Ct. 250 , 90 L.Ed. 203 , are controlling here and need not be again stated. The decision of the Tax Court is Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1963: 11965: 21966: 11968: 11969: 119632026peak 1965 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. James J. Ritter v. The United States393 F.2d 823 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  2. Starr v. Commissioner46 T.C. 743 (Tax Ct. 1966)
  3. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Walter H351 F.2d 580 (4th Cir. 1965)
  4. Kenneth D. England and Connie J. England v. United States345 F.2d 414 (7th Cir. 1965)
  5. Mendel v. Commissioner41 T.C. 32 (Tax Ct. 1963)
  6. Lull v. Commissioner51 T.C. 841 (Tax Ct. 1969)

Most recent

  1. Lull v. Commissioner51 T.C. 841 (Tax Ct. 1969)
  2. James J. Ritter v. The United States393 F.2d 823 (Ct. Cl. 1968)
  3. Starr v. Commissioner46 T.C. 743 (Tax Ct. 1966)
  4. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Walter H351 F.2d 580 (4th Cir. 1965)
  5. Kenneth D. England and Connie J. England v. United States345 F.2d 414 (7th Cir. 1965)
  6. Mendel v. Commissioner41 T.C. 32 (Tax Ct. 1963)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Comm'r v. Flowers, 326 U.S. 465 (1946) 996

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list