TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re Villa Maria Inst. of Music

In the Matter of Villa Maria Institute of Music, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent

In re Villa Maria Inst. of Music, 426 N.E.2d 466 (N.Y. 1981)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 6, 1981
Judges
Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer Concur in Memorandum
Citations
426 N.E.2d 46654 N.Y.2d 691442 N.Y.S.2d 9721981 N.Y. LEXIS 2628

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

There was substantial evidence in the record to support the determination of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that an employment relationship existed between the Villa Maria Institute of Music and the instructors. Whether an employment relationship exists necessarily is a question of fact, involving a determination of “the existence of a right of control over the agent in respect of the manner in which his work is to be done”

(Matter of Morton, 284 NY 167,172 ; see Matter of Liberman v Gallman, 41 NY2d 774, 778 ). All aspects of the arrangement must lie examined to determine whether the degree of control and direction reserved to the employer establishes an employment relationship (Matter of Morton, 284 NY, at p 173 , supra; Matter of Liberman v Gallman, 41 NY2d, at p 778 , supra;

cf.

*693 Matter of Wittenstein v Fugazy Cont. Corp., 59 AD2d 249 , mot for Iv to app den, 43 NY2d 648 ).

Contrary to petitioner’s argument, the record as a whole provides sufficient support for the board’s determination. While there was evidence from which a contrary conclusion could have been drawn, the board was not required to accept petitioner’s characterization of the instructors as independent contractors (see Matter of MNORX, Inc.

[Ross], 46 NY2d 985, 986 ;

Matter of Liberman v Gallman, supra, at p 779). The conclusion that evidence exists to sustain the determination ends the judicial inquiry (see Matter of Burger [Corsi], 303 NY 654, 656 ).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 35 cases

View all citing references →
1981: 11982: 31983: 41984: 11986: 31987: 21990: 31991: 11992: 21993: 21994: 11995: 21996: 11997: 22011: 22016: 12018: 12020: 22021: 119812026peak 1983 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Voltaire v. Home Services Systems, Inc.823 F. Supp. 2d 77 (E.D.N.Y. 2011)
  2. Dortz v. City of New York904 F. Supp. 127 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
  3. Goyette v. DCA Advertising Inc.830 F. Supp. 737 (S.D.N.Y. 1993)
  4. Alie v. Nynex Corp.158 F.R.D. 239 (E.D.N.Y. 1994)
  5. Tagare v. NYNEX Network Systems Co.994 F. Supp. 149 (S.D.N.Y. 1997)
  6. IBM Poughkeepsie Employees Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance Society, Inc.590 F. Supp. 769 (S.D.N.Y. 1984)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Liberman v. Gallman, 364 N.E.2d 823 (N.Y. 1977) 78
In re the Claim of Morton, 30 N.E.2d 369 (N.Y. 1940) 123
Wittenstein v. Fugazy Cont'l Corp., 59 A.D.2d 249 (1977) 17
In re the Claims of Burger, 101 N.E.2d 763 (N.Y. 1951) 12
In re Mnorx, Inc., 389 N.E.2d 823 (N.Y. 1979) 11

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list