TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Village of Tarrytown v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc.

Village of Tarrytown, Respondent, v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc., Appellant

Vill. of Tarrytown v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc., 225 N.E.2d 547 (N.Y. 1967)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 16, 1967
Citations
225 N.E.2d 54719 N.Y.2d 660278 N.Y.S.2d 8531967 N.Y. LEXIS 1749
Cited by 5

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Since the contract herein is invalid and void (see Scarborough Props. Corp.

v. Village of Briarcliff Manor, 278 N. Y. 370 ), the arbitration clause therein falls with the contract and is unenforcible. Reimbursement for the installation of utilities in the streets to be dedicated to the village was not provided for in the manner prescribed by Village Law (§ 89, subd. 61), and there was a failure to provide for the payment of the village’s obligations under this contract in any one of the modes prescribed by former section 128-b of the Village Law (now § 126, subd. 2).

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi, Bergan and Breitel. Taking no part: Judge Keating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 5 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 11983: 21991: 11993: 119752026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Rhodes v. Consumers' Buyline, Inc.868 F. Supp. 368 (D. Mass. 1993)
  2. In re the Estate of Rothko84 Misc. 2d 830 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1975)
  3. City of Zanesville v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.97 A.D.2d 64 (1983)
  4. Village of Tarrytown v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc.97 A.D.2d 338 (1983)
  5. Chassman v. People Resources151 Misc. 2d 525 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1991)

Most recent

  1. Rhodes v. Consumers' Buyline, Inc.868 F. Supp. 368 (D. Mass. 1993)
  2. Chassman v. People Resources151 Misc. 2d 525 (N.Y. City Civ. Ct. 1991)
  3. Village of Tarrytown v. Woodland Lake Estates, Inc.97 A.D.2d 338 (1983)
  4. City of Zanesville v. Mohawk Data Sciences Corp.97 A.D.2d 64 (1983)
  5. In re the Estate of Rothko84 Misc. 2d 830 (N.Y. Sur. Ct. 1975)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Scarborough Props. Corp. v. Vill. of Briarcliff Manor, 16 N.E.2d 369 (N.Y. 1938) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list