TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.

Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc., Appellant, v. Peat Marwick Main & Co., as Successor to Main Hurdman and KMG Hurdman, Respondent

Sec. Pac. Bus. Credit, Inc. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co., 602 N.E.2d 1118 (N.Y. 1992)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 17, 1992
Citations
602 N.E.2d 111880 N.Y.2d 918589 N.Y.S.2d 3021992 N.Y. LEXIS 3271

Opinion

Motion to amend remittitur and for reargument denied, with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements.

[See, 79 NY2d 695 .]

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Sec. Pac. Bus. Credit, Inc. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co., 597 N.E.2d 1080 (N.Y. 1992) 70

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list