TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Tanzosh v. New York City Civil Serv. Comm'n

In the Matter of William Tanzosh, Appellant, v. New York City Civil Service Commission Et Al., Respondents

Tanzosh v. N.Y. City Civil Serv. Comm'n, 379 N.E.2d 166 (N.Y. 1978)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 8, 1978
Judges
Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke Concur in Memorandum
Citations
379 N.E.2d 16644 N.Y.2d 90644 N.Y. 906407 N.Y.S.2d 6381978 N.Y. LEXIS 2095

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs. Petitioner did not commence this article 78 proceeding seeking appointment until after the subject list of eligibles had expired. Accordingly, the courts may grant him neither appointment from that expired list (Matter of Cash v Bates, 301 NY 258, 261 ;

Matter of New York City Dept. of Personnel v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 44 NY2d 907 , decided herewith; cf.

Matter of Mena v DAmbrose, 44 NY2d 428 ), nor the equivalent relief he now seeks of retroactive seniority in his subsequently obtained civil service position (cf.

Matter of New York City Dept. of Personnel v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 58 AD2d 787 , affd 44 NY2d 907 , decided herewith). We express no view as to what would be the proper result had petitioner instead commenced a proceeding prior to the expiration of the list and that proceeding had been dismissed for a failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 10 cases

View all citing references →
1978: 11981: 11986: 11988: 11989: 11990: 11992: 11998: 11999: 219782026peak 1999 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Deas v. Levitt539 N.E.2d 1086 (N.Y. 1989) · Dissent
  2. Deas v. Levitt139 A.D.2d 1 (1988) · Dissent
  3. Ganguly v. New York State Department of Mental Hygiene-Dunlap Manhattan Psychiatric Center511 F. Supp. 420 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)
  4. Kurland v. McLaughlin122 A.D.2d 947 (1986)
  5. City of New York v. New York State Division of Human Rights720 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1999)
  6. City of New York v. New York State Division of Human Rights250 A.D.2d 273 (1998)

Most recent

  1. City of NY v. STATE DHR720 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1999)
  2. City of New York v. New York State Division of Human Rights720 N.E.2d 870 (N.Y. 1999)
  3. City of New York v. New York State Division of Human Rights250 A.D.2d 273 (1998)
  4. Moskowitz v. White182 A.D.2d 381 (1992)
  5. Boasi v. New York City Civil Service Commission158 A.D.2d 318 (1990)
  6. Deas v. Levitt539 N.E.2d 1086 (N.Y. 1989) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
120 Bay St. Realty Corp. v. City of N.Y., 379 N.E.2d 167 (N.Y. 1978) 5
Cash v. Bates, 93 N.E.2d 835 (N.Y. 1950) 66
N.Y. City Dep't of Pers. v. N.Y. State Div. of Human Rights, 58 A.D.2d 787 (1977) 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list