People ex rel. Hahn v. Haines
The People of the State of New York Ex Rel. Joseph T. Hahn, Appellant, Against Larry Haines, Respondent, Et Al., Defendants
Opinion
Per Curiam.
Order affirmed on the opinion below, without costs. In affirming, we do not pass upon the merits of the substantive controversy between the parties. The motion of petitioner, made upon the argument, “ to strike and expunge ” certain papers enumerated in his notice of motion is denied.
*837 Interpreting the motion as one to deny consideration of those papers (Brown v. University of State of N. Y., 265 N. Y. 290 ), we have disregarded all of them other than the stenographer’s minutes, except as they may otherwise be reflected in the settled record.
As to the minutes, aside from the fact that they were concededly before the Appellate Division and are a part of the record in the Westchester County proceeding, we have considered them under the well-settled rule that undisputed record evidence outside the settled record on an appeal may be resorted to to sustain a determination (Stemmler v. Mayor of New York, 179 N. Y. 473, 482 ; Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, p. 640).
Conway, Ch. J., Desmond, Dye, Fold, Fboessel, Van Voorhis and Burke, JJ., concur.
Order affirmed.
Motion denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.