TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lando v. State

Ferdinando Lando, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Rose Lando, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent

Lando v. State, 351 N.E.2d 426 (N.Y. 1976)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 4, 1976
Docket
No. Claim 54483
Judges
Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke Concur
Citations
351 N.E.2d 42639 N.Y.2d 803385 N.Y.S.2d 7591976 N.Y. LEXIS 2749

Opinion

Memorandum. We agree with the Appellate Division that the claimant, as administrator, failed to present sufficient proof to support the estate’s claims for his deceased daughter’s conscious pain and suffering before death and for her wrongful death. However, since we agree with the Court of Claims that he did prove his claim for his own mental anguish, a matter not discussed by the Appellate Division in its opinion, there should be a modification.

The record amply demonstrates that the hospital, once learning that claimant’s daughter had disappeared, negligently failed to undertake a careful and diligent search of the hospital premises in order to locate this mentally deficient patient. The inadequacy of the purported search is pointed up by the fact that the daughter’s body when found was lying in a wooded area of the hospital grounds a mere 50 feet from the edge of the parking lot of the building adjacent to the one in *805 which she resided. The claimant was, therefore, entitled to damages for the mental anguish he suffered when, solely by reason of the hospital’s negligence, he was denied access to and control over the body of his deceased daughter for a period of 11 days.

Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be modified by reinstating the judgment in favor of the claimant, individually, in the amount of $5,000 and, as so modified, affirmed.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.

Order modified, with costs to claimant, in accordance with memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 3 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

Cited by 33 cases

View all citing references →
1977: 11983: 21984: 11985: 11986: 11987: 11989: 11992: 11993: 11994: 11995: 11997: 11998: 12000: 22003: 22006: 12007: 32009: 12012: 12013: 12015: 12020: 32021: 12023: 12025: 219772026peak 2007 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Maracallo v. Board of Education2 Misc. 3d 703 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2003)
  2. Maracallo v. Board of Educ. of the City of New York2003 NY Slip Op 23916 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2003)
  3. Johnson v. Jamaica Hospital467 N.E.2d 502 (N.Y. 1984)
  4. Vumbaca v. Terminal One Group Ass'n859 F. Supp. 2d 343 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)
  5. SanMiguel v. Grimaldi2025 NY Slip Op 05780 (N.Y. 2025)
  6. Taggart v. Costabile131 A.D.3d 243 (2015)

Most recent

  1. SanMiguel v. Grimaldi2025 NY Slip Op 05780 (N.Y. 2025)
  2. Ballan v. Greenberg2025 NY Slip Op 04860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2025)
  3. Brown v. New York Design Ctr., Inc.185 N.Y.S.3d 97 (2023)
  4. Pisula v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y.2021 NY Slip Op 06872
  5. Poppel v. Rockefeller University HospitalNo. 1:19-cv-01403 (S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2020)
  6. Fox v. Mark2020 NY Slip Op 1477

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list