People v. Soto
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gabriel Soto, Appellant
Opinion
Defendant’s conviction was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490 ). Viewed as a whole, the evidence, including defendant’s secretive behavior, clearly warranted the conclusion that the drugs recovered from the buyer were the same “small objects” that defendant had just been observed giving to the buyer in exchange for money.
We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims, including those contained in his pro se supplemental brief. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.