Tabacalera Severiano Jorge, S.A. v. Standard Cigar Company
TABACALERA SEVERIANO JORGE, S.A., Appellant, v. STANDARD CIGAR COMPANY, Appellee
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We conclude from a careful review of' the entire record that the District Court’s, dismissal of the complaint must be reversed for the reasons stated in our opinion of this date in the case of Menendez. Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company (Vento Jaime v. Pan American Life Insurance Company.) 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 429 .
The residual questions of law in this-, case not specifically dealt with in our-opinion above are more properly determinable by the District Court upon full" hearing on the merits.
This cause is reversed and remanded' with directions for further proceedings, not inconsistent with our opinion in the-Rodriguez case.
Reversed and remanded for further-proceedings.
Concurrence
CAMERON, Circuit Judge,
concurs in. the result.
On Rehearing
*439 On Petition for Rehearing
Before CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The factual distinctions between this case and Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company, etc., 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 429 , referred to by appellee in its petition for rehearing do not require a different application of law. For this reason, and for the reasons stated in denial of petition for rehearing this date in the case of Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company, etc., supra, this petition for rehearing is
Denied.
Combined text as published — syllabus, headnotes and all opinions in one document
311 F.2d 438
TABACALERA SEVERIANO JORGE, S.A., Appellant, v. STANDARD CIGAR COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 19101.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 17, 1962, Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1962.
Thomas H. Anderson, Anderson & Nadeau, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
William A. Gillen, Fowler, White, Gillen, Humkey & Trenam, Tampa, Fla., for appellee.
Before CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
1
We conclude from a careful review of the entire record that the District Court's dismissal of the complaint must be reversed for the reasons stated in our opinion of this date in the case of Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company (vento Jaime v. Pan American Life Insurance Company.) 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 429 .
2
The residual questions of law in this case not specifically dealt with in our opinion above are more properly determinable by the District Court upon full hearing on the merits.
3
This cause is reversed and remanded with directions for further proceedings not inconsistent with our opinion in the Rodriguez case.
4
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
5
CAMERON, Circuit Judge, concurs in the result.
On Petition for Rehearing 6
Before CAMERON and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
7
PER CURIAM.
8
The factual distinctions between this case and Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company, etc., 5 Cir., 311 F.2d 429 , referred to by appellee in its petition for rehearing do not require a different application of law. For this reason, and for the reasons stated in denial of petiton for rehearing this date in the case of Menendez Rodriguez v. Pan American Life Insurance Company, etc., supra, this petition for rehearing is 9
Denied.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.