TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

McGOVERN v. Lowery

McGOVERN v. Lowery, 300 N.E.2d 736 (N.Y. 1973)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
June 8, 1973
Citations
300 N.E.2d 73632 N.Y.2d 954347 N.Y.S.2d 2051973 N.Y. LEXIS 1170
Cited by 9

Opinion

32 N.Y.2d 954 (1973)

In the Matter of Luke P. McGovern, Appellant,

v.

Robert O. Lowery, as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York and as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the New York Fire Department Pension Fund, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Submitted May 29, 1973. Decided June 8, 1973.

Edward H. Freiberger for appellant.

Norman Redlich , Corporation Counsel ( Edmund B. Hennefeld and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for respondents.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, BREITEL, JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER.

Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 9 cases

View all citing references →
1975: 11976: 31977: 21978: 11982: 11997: 119752026peak 1976 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Fiore v. Board of Education Retirement System48 A.D.2d 850 (1975)
  2. Bulger v. Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund Article 251 A.D.2d 950 (1976)
  3. Meyer v. Board of Trustees681 N.E.2d 382 (N.Y. 1997)
  4. Schweitzer v. Codd63 A.D.2d 66 (1978)
  5. Belnavis v. Board of Trustees84 A.D.2d 244 (1982)
  6. Tanzosh v. New York City Civil Service Commission58 A.D.2d 522 (1977)

Most recent

  1. Meyer v. Board of Trustees681 N.E.2d 382 (N.Y. 1997)
  2. Belnavis v. Board of Trustees84 A.D.2d 244 (1982)
  3. Schweitzer v. Codd63 A.D.2d 66 (1978)
  4. Rudnitsky v. Anker58 A.D.2d 653 (1977)
  5. Tanzosh v. New York City Civil Service Commission58 A.D.2d 522 (1977)
  6. Gibbs v. New York City Employees' Retirement System88 Misc. 2d 880 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1976)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list