TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

In re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp.

In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Company, Ltd., Appellant, and Mediterranean & Oriental Steamship Corp., Respondent

In re the Arbitration Between Uraga Dock Co. & Mediterranean & Oriental S.S. Corp., 159 N.E.2d 212 (N.Y. 1959)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
April 17, 1959
Citations
159 N.E.2d 2126 N.Y.2d 773186 N.Y.S.2d 6691959 N.Y. LEXIS 1413

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke. Judge Dye dissents and votes to reverse upon the ground that the contract never became effective because of the failure to make the initial payment upon the terms and within the time provided. Proceedings to compel arbitration presuppose the existence of a valid and enforcible contract (Matter of Kramer & Uchitelle, 288 N. Y. 467 ).

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1960: 11961: 12009: 119602026peak 1960 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
In re Kramer Uchitelle, Inc., 43 N.E.2d 493 (N.Y. 1942) 81

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list