Antinore v. State of New York

Donald Antinore, Appellant, v. State of New York Et Al., Respondents

Antinore v. State, 358 N.E.2d 268 (N.Y. 1976)

Court: New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided: November 16, 1976
Citations: 358 N.E.2d 26840 N.Y.2d 921389 N.Y.S.2d 5761976 N.Y. LEXIS 309094 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2224

Cited by 78 1 descriptions by later courts

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, on the opinion by Mr. Justice Frank Del Vecchio at the Appellate Division except insofar as the opinion refers to the necessity for importing particular procedural safeguards into this arbitration proceeding under CPLR article 75.

Concur: Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke.

How later courts describe this case

Explanatory parentheticals written by citing courts — 1 in all; the most informative distinct ones are shown.

(binding arbitration procedures must be viewed as advancing public good by expedition of resolution of disciplinary disputes in simpler, more prompt manner)

Tedesco v. City of Stamford, 610 A.2d 574 (Conn. 1992)

Cited by 78 cases

View all citing references →

Relies on it most ⓘ

City of Newburgh v. Potter142 Misc. 2d 376 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1989)
Tedesco v. City of Stamford610 A.2d 574 (Conn. 1992)
Shoreline Community College District No. 7 v. Employment Security Department842 P.2d 938 (Wash. 1993)
Guilford v. City of Buffalo150 Misc. 2d 1021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1991)
Morris v. Lindau196 F.3d 102 (2d Cir. 1999)
Abramovich v. Board of Education386 N.E.2d 1077 (N.Y. 1979)

Most recent

159 MP Corp v. Redbridge BedfordNo. 26 (N.Y. May 7, 2019)
Marentette v. City of Canandaigua351 F. Supp. 3d 410 (W.D.N.Y. 2019)
THOMPSON, JEFFREY A. v. BURNS, JOHN P.No. CA 13-01873 (N.Y. App. Div. June 13, 2014)
Thompson v. Burns118 A.D.3d 1276 (2014)
DIETZ, THOMAS v. BD OF EDUCATION OF ROCH CITY SCHOOLNo. CA 12-00312 (N.Y. App. Div. Sept. 28, 2012)
Dietz v. Board of Education of Rochester City School District98 A.D.3d 1251 (2012)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

`/`	Focus the search box
`j` `k`	Next / previous result
`Enter`	Open the selected result
`x`	Add / remove the selected result from the download list
`n` `p`	Next / previous search term in a case
`c`	Copy the citation of the current case
`+` `−`	Larger / smaller reading text
`?`	Show this list