TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pike v. State

Walter F. Pike, Individually and as Representative of the Heirs, Distributees and Estate of Florence A. Pike, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 1.) (And Another Action.); Thomas C. Van Amburg, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Denise Van Amburg, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. (Action No. 3.)

Pike v. State, 86 N.Y.2d 811 (1995)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 12, 1995
Citations
86 N.Y.2d 811

Opinion

Motion by appellant Pike, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed the denial of his motion for reargument, dismissed upon the ground that that portion of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied. Motion by appellant Van Amburg for leave to appeal denied.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list