TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Neo-Ray Products, Inc. v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc.

Neo-Ray Products, Inc., Appellant, v. Boro Electric Installation, Inc., Et Al., Respondents

Neo-Ray Prods., Inc. v. Boro Elec. Installation, Inc., 399 N.E.2d 952 (N.Y. 1979)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 15, 1979
Citations
399 N.E.2d 95248 N.Y.2d 781423 N.Y.S.2d 9221979 N.Y. LEXIS 2442

Opinion

*783 OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division ( 65 AD2d 687 ).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1982: 11984: 11997: 119822026peak 1982 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Neo-Ray Prods., Inc. v. Boro Elec. Installation, Inc., 65 A.D.2d 687 (1978) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list