TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

WEIR METRO AMBU-SERV., INC. v. Turner

Weir Metro Ambu-Serv., Inc. v. Turner, 442 N.E.2d 1268 (N.Y. 1982)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
New York Court of Appeals · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 19, 1982
Judges
Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer Concur
Citations
442 N.E.2d 126857 N.Y.2d 911456 N.Y.S.2d 7571982 N.Y. LEXIS 3779

Opinion

57 N.Y.2d 911 (1982)

Weir Metro Ambu-Service, Inc., Appellant,

v.

Sophia Turner et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 19, 1982.

Robert J. Dinerstein for appellant.

Doris G. Traub for respondents.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

*912 MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff's first cause of action failed to allege either the elements of scienter or deceit, each essential to a cause of action for fraud (24 NY Jur, Fraud and Deceit, § 140). Insufficient too, is the plaintiff's second cause of action since the oral agreement on which it was based contravened the requirement that a contract to perform services for a medical facility which has been issued an operating certificate or certificate of approval be in writing (10 NYCRR 400.4 [a] [1]; see Tooker v Inter-County Tit. Guar. & Mtge. Co. , 295 N.Y. 386 ). Finally, as to the third cause of action, punitive damages may not be sought as a separate cause of action (see Trans-State Hay & Feed Corp. v Faberge, Inc. , 42 AD2d 535 , affd 35 N.Y.2d 669 ).

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1986: 11995: 11996: 11997: 119862026peak 1986 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Unker v. Joseph Markovits, Inc.643 F. Supp. 1043 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
  2. Stylianou v. St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center902 F. Supp. 54 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
  3. O'Hearn v. Spence-Chapin Services to Families & Children, Inc.929 F. Supp. 136 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
  4. Stuart v. Danka Corp.986 F. Supp. 741 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)

Most recent

  1. Stuart v. Danka Corp.986 F. Supp. 741 (E.D.N.Y. 1997)
  2. O'Hearn v. Spence-Chapin Services to Families & Children, Inc.929 F. Supp. 136 (S.D.N.Y. 1996)
  3. Stylianou v. St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital Center902 F. Supp. 54 (S.D.N.Y. 1995)
  4. Unker v. Joseph Markovits, Inc.643 F. Supp. 1043 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Tooker v. Inter-Cnty. Title Guar. & Mortg. Co., 68 N.E.2d 179 (N.Y. 1946) 12
Trans-State Hay & Feed Corp. v. Faberge, Inc., 42 A.D.2d 535 (1973) 11
Trans-State Hay & Feed Corp. v. Faberge, Inc., 319 N.E.2d 201 (N.Y. 1974) 10

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list