SEDA v. Richards
In the Matter of Nestor J. Seda, Jr., Respondent, Et Al., Petitioners, v. Martin Richards Et Al., Respondents, and Reuben Bradford, Appellant
Seda v. Richards, 440 N.E.2d 1334 (N.Y. 1982)
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT Order affirmed, without costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum opinion at the Appellate Division.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Gabrielli.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.