TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Beler v. Savarona Ship Corporation

BELER Et Al. v. SAVARONA SHIP CORPORATION Et Al.

Beler v. Savarona Ship Corp., 26 F. Supp. 599 (E.D.N.Y. 1939)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
District Court, E.D. New York · Federal District Courts
Decided
February 10, 1939
Docket
No. 4
Judges
Moscowitz
Citations
26 F. Supp. 59913 Ohio Op. 5161939 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2979

Opinion — Moscowitz

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion for an order directing the entry of judgment by default against the defendant Savarona Ship Corporation because of failure to comply with a stipulation approved by the Court, requiring the production, and permitting the inspection of certain books, records and documents. In the alternative, it is asked that certain facts be taken to be admitted.

Defendant has sought to justify its refusal to permit the discovery called for by the stipulation of the parties on the ground that there is no showing that the documents sought to be examined would establish facts relevant to the issues of the case. Rule 34, Rules of Civil Procedure for District Courts, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, permits the discovery of documents “which constitute or contain evidence material to any matter involved in the action.” The requirement of materiality does not, however, compel the person seeking discovery definitely to prove materiality before being entitled to a discovery. Such an interpretation of the rule would place upon it a narrow construction which would severely limit the bounds of the discovery procedure. It might compel a party to know what was in the documents before he had seen them. One of the basic purposes of the new Rules is to enable a full disclosure of the facts so that justice might not move blindly.

Since materiality is not easily determined before trial when issues are first being formulated, it is sufficient that the party seeking discovery establish that it is reasonably probable that the documents sought to be examined constitute or contain material evidence. See Moore, Federal Practice (1938) Section 34. 04. In the instant case the parties have stipulated the production of certain documents. In doing so, they must be deemed to have waived any showing of reasonable prob *600 ability of materiality or else be deemed to have concluded that this requirement had been met.

Since the relief sought by plaintiffs is rather drastic and the Rules new, and their application not fully understood, defendant will be given a reasonable time, to be fixed in the order to be entered herein, within which to produce the stipulated documents, in default of which plaintiffs may apply for further relief.

Settle order on notice.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1940: 11941: 21942: 11944: 11946: 21947: 11950: 41954: 11955: 11958: 11964: 21980: 119402026peak 1950 · 4

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.629 P.2d 231 (N.M. 1980)
  2. Dean v. Superior Court324 P.2d 764 (Ariz. 1958)
  3. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States38 F.R.D. 57 (N.D. Ohio 1964)
  4. Wild v. Payson7 F.R.D. 495 (S.D.N.Y. 1946)
  5. United Mercantile Agencies v. Silver Fleet Motor Express, Inc.1 F.R.D. 709 (W.D. Ky. 1941)
  6. Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.16 F.R.D. 534 (D. Del. 1954)

Most recent

  1. United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.629 P.2d 231 (N.M. 1980)
  2. Rockaway Pix Theatre, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.36 F.R.D. 15 (E.D.N.Y. 1964)
  3. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. United States38 F.R.D. 57 (N.D. Ohio 1964)
  4. Dean v. Superior Court324 P.2d 764 (Ariz. 1958)
  5. Radio Corp. v. Rauland Corp.18 F.R.D. 440 (N.D. Ill. 1955)
  6. Tobacco & Allied Stocks, Inc. v. Transamerica Corp.16 F.R.D. 534 (D. Del. 1954)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list