United States v. Roosevelt Chaney, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Roosevelt CHANEY, Mike Mitchell Quinn, Roy Mitchell Quinn, John Elton Whitlow, and Carl Edward Wright, Appellants
United States v. Chaney, 316 F.2d 188 (4th Cir. 1963)
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is a prosecution for violation of the liquor laws. An examination of the record satisfies us that the evidence furnished a sufficient basis for the jury’s finding of guilt as to each of the defendants. Objections to the evidence are without merit, and we find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.