TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

J. H. Deveau and Son, Inc. v. William R. Ott, Jr.

J. H. DeVEAU AND SON, INC., Appellant, v. William R. OTT, Jr., Et Al., Appellees

J. H. Deveau & Son, Inc. v. Ott, 317 F.2d 138 (D.C. Cir. 1963)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
February 14, 1963
Docket
No. 17191_1
Judges
Fahy, Bastían, Weight
Citations
317 F.2d 138115 U.S. App. D.C. 741963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6144

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from judgments of the District Court in a personal injury case. The action was brought by the infant appellee (plaintiff) for personal injuries, and by his father (co-plaintiff) for medical expenses incurred. The defendants were Washington Gas Light Company, a public utility, and J. H. De-Veau & Son, Inc., a corporation engaged in making repairs for the utility. The damages were alleged to have been incurred by the minor plaintiff, a child 3% years old, by his being burned by an open flame of a flare-pot set in the street as a warning of a barricade or excavation.

At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case, and at the conclusion of all the evidence, motions on behalf of the defendants were made for a directed ver *139 diet. The motion was granted on behalf of the public utility, but denied insofar as DeVeau was concerned.

1

The opinion of the trial court is reported at 205 F. Supp. 815 (1962), sub nom. Ott v. Washington Gas Light Co. The case against DeVeau was submitted to the jury, which returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs, and judgments were entered thereon. This appeal followed.

We are in general agreement with the opinion of the trial judge and, on the basis of his reasoning therein, affirm the judgments.

Affirmed.

1

. No appeal was taken by the plaintiffs from the judgment in favor of Washington Gas Light Company.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1967: 11974: 119672026peak 1967 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Cutlip v. Lucky Stores, Inc.325 A.2d 432 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1974)
  2. Myers v. Gaither232 A.2d 577 (D.C. 1967)

Most recent

  1. Cutlip v. Lucky Stores, Inc.325 A.2d 432 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1974)
  2. Myers v. Gaither232 A.2d 577 (D.C. 1967)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Ott v. Wash. Gas Light Co., 205 F. Supp. 815 (D.D.C. 1962) 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list