TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

F. L. Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Company

F. L. BROWN, Appellant, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellee

F. L. Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. Co., 323 F.2d 420 (8th Cir. 1963)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
October 10, 1963
Docket
No. 17379_1
Judges
Sanborn, Matthes, Robinson
Citations
323 F.2d 420

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Appellant (plaintiff) filed this suit in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, on February 14, 1961, claiming he was libeled and damaged by a letter written by appellee (defendant). The action was removed to the United States District Court, Western District of Missouri. Concededly, the letter was addressed to a third person, was written by appellee on April 16, 1958, and was not discovered or seen by appellant until November, 1959. The district court granted appellee’s motion for a summary judgment and dismissed appellant’s complaint with prejudice on the ground that appellant’s cause of action was barred by Missouri’s two-year statute of limitations. V.A.M.S. § 516.140.

Appellant contends that a genuine issue of fact exists as to when the alleged libelous letter was published, and argues that the pleadings, admissions, depositions, and other documents do not conclusively establish that, under Missouri law, the letter was published, as found by the trial judge, on April 17, 1958 — more than two years before the action was commenced.

The facts are accurately set forth below at 212 F.Supp. 832 (D.C., 1963) and need no further elaboration here. Having carefully examined the record, the contentions of the parties, and the applicable Missouri law, we are satisfied that the trial court reached a permissible conclusion in granting appellee’s motion for summary judgment and thereby holding that the cause of action was barred.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1969: 21971: 11975: 11977: 11979: 11981: 11983: 11985: 21987: 11989: 219692026peak 1969 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wild v. Rarig234 N.W.2d 775 (Minn. 1975)
  2. Manguso v. Oceanside Unified School District88 Cal. App. 3d 725 (1979)
  3. Clark v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Arizona, Inc.673 P.2d 984 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983)
  4. Mikaelian v. Drug Abuse Unit501 A.2d 721 (R.I. 1985)
  5. McCutcheon v. State746 P.2d 461 (Alaska 1987)
  6. White v. Fawcett Publications324 F. Supp. 403 (W.D. Mo. 1971)

Most recent

  1. No. 88-5542875 F.2d 66 (3d Cir. 1989)
  2. Palestri v. Monogram Models, Inc.875 F.2d 66 (3d Cir. 1989)
  3. McCutcheon v. State746 P.2d 461 (Alaska 1987)
  4. Mikaelian v. Drug Abuse Unit501 A.2d 721 (R.I. 1985)
  5. Jones v. Pinkerton's, Inc.700 S.W.2d 456 (Mo. Ct. App. 1985)
  6. Clark v. Airesearch Manufacturing Co. of Arizona, Inc.673 P.2d 984 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Brown v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. R.R. Co., 212 F. Supp. 832 (W.D. Mo. 1963) 14

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list