Birdseye v. Schaeffer
Birdseye v. Schaeffer, 140 U.S. 117 (1891)
Syllabus
It is again decided that an order remanding a cause from a Circuit Court' of the United States to the state court from which it was removed, is not a final judgment or decree which this court has jurisdiction to review.
Summary
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.
This cause was removed to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas prior to the passage' of the act of March 3, 1887, providing that no appeal or writ of error from the decision of the Circuit Court remanding a .cause to a state court from which it had been removed, should be allowed. The order remanding the cause to the state court from which it had been removed was made subsequent to that act, but prior to' the act of February 25, 1889; the writ of error was allowed on the 7th of June, a.d. 1889, subsequent to the act of February 25, 1889.
A motion was made to dismiss the writ on the grounds: (1) That there was no jurisdiction to issue the same and no jurisdiction to take cognizance of the record filed herein; (2) Because the judgment of the Circuit Court complained of, remanding the cause to the District Court of Nueces County, Texas, from which it had been removed for trial, was not a final judgment and cannot be reviewed by this court.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion
Per Curiam.
The writ of error is dismissed upon the authority of Gurnee v. Patrick County, 137 U. S. 141 ;
Richmond & Danville Railroad Co.
v. Thouron, 131 U. S. 45 .
Dismissed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.