TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Frank H. Goforth v. Allstate Insurance Company

Frank H. GOFORTH, Appellee, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

Goforth v. Allstate Ins. Co., 327 F.2d 637 (4th Cir. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
January 24, 1964
Docket
No. 9210
Judges
Haynsworth, Boreman, Michie
Citations
327 F.2d 637

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the District Court that a private automobile being driven from the place of business of the owner by a garage keeper to his garage for the purpose of effecting repairs requested by the owner was not being “used in the automobile business” within the meaning of an exclusion clause in the owner’s liability insurance policy.

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1967: 11968: 11971: 11973: 11974: 11975: 11980: 119672026peak 1967 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Grahame v. Mitchell329 N.E.2d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  2. Christensen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange443 P.2d 385 (Utah 1968)
  3. Continental National American Group v. Allied Mutual Insurance506 P.2d 478 (Idaho 1973)
  4. Donald Helmich v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Co.376 F.2d 420 (7th Cir. 1967)
  5. Kravis v. Smith-Marine, Inc.314 N.E.2d 577 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
  6. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Verhulst471 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. 1971)

Most recent

  1. MFA Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance595 S.W.2d 706 (Ark. Ct. App. 1980)
  2. Grahame v. Mitchell329 N.E.2d 17 (Ill. App. Ct. 1975)
  3. Kravis v. Smith-Marine, Inc.314 N.E.2d 577 (Ill. App. Ct. 1974)
  4. Continental National American Group v. Allied Mutual Insurance506 P.2d 478 (Idaho 1973)
  5. Western Casualty & Surety Co. v. Verhulst471 S.W.2d 187 (Mo. 1971)
  6. Christensen v. Farmers Insurance Exchange443 P.2d 385 (Utah 1968)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
A/s Glittre v. Fontenot, 327 F.2d 637 (5th Cir. 1964) 0

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list