TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

United States ex rel. Cuthbert Eastman v. Hon. Edward M. Fay

United States of America Ex Rel. Cuthbert Eastman, Relator-Appellee v. Hon. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York, Andthe People of the State of New York

United States ex rel. Cuthbert Eastman v. Fay, 333 F.2d 28 (2d Cir. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
June 15, 1964
Docket
No. 28612_1
Citations
333 F.2d 281964 U.S. App. LEXIS 5060

Opinion

333 F.2d 28

UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Cuthbert EASTMAN, Relator-Appellee, v. Hon. Edward M. FAY, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Stormville, New York, andthe People of the State of New York, Respondents-Appellants.

No. 363, Docket 28612.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 17, 1964. Decided June 15, 1964.

Leon B. Polsky, New York City (Anthony F. Marra, New York City, on the brief), for relator-appellee.

Ronald J. Offenkrantz, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., and Irving Galt, Asst. Solicitor .general, on the brief), for respondents-appellants.

Before FRIENDLY, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Relator seeks habeas corpus claiming that his confinement under a state court conviction violates the fourth amendment because of an illegal search and seizure. The alleged search and seizure occurred on or about February 25, 1956. Relator's conviction became final on July 23, 1956, when his appeal from the judgment of conviction was dismissed for lack of prosecution. In granting the writ, Judge Tyler held that relator was entitled to relief under Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), even though relator's conviction became final prior to that decision and prior to the search and seizure that was the subject of the Mapp case. 1 This court sitting en banc in United States ex rel. Angelet v. Fay, 1964, 333 F.2d 12 , held that Mapp is not to be given such retroactive effect. Accordingly the order must be reversed with directions to deny the writ.

2

Order reversed.

1

Miss Mapp's apartment was searched unlawfully on May 23, 1957, 367 U.S. at 644 , 81 S.Ct. 1684

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1964: 11965: 119642026peak 1964 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. United States ex rel. Smith v. Reincke239 F. Supp. 887 (D. Conn. 1965)
  2. Rice v. Warden237 F. Supp. 463 (D. Maryland 1964)

Most recent

  1. United States ex rel. Smith v. Reincke239 F. Supp. 887 (D. Conn. 1965)
  2. Rice v. Warden237 F. Supp. 463 (D. Maryland 1964)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961) 7,228
United States ex rel. George Angelet v. Fay, 333 F.2d 12 (2d Cir. 1964) (Concurrence) 49

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list