TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Eleftherios Liadakis v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Eleftherios LIADAKIS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent

Eleftherios Liadakis v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 339 F.2d 447 (4th Cir. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 7, 1964
Docket
No. 9442_1
Judges
Sobeloff, Fahy, Bryan
Citations
339 F.2d 4471964 U.S. App. LEXIS 3674

Opinion — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner is concededly a deportable alien. Pursuant to Section 243 (h) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 66 Stat. 214 (1952), 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (1958), he applied to the Attorney General to exercise his discretion to withhold deportation. After intermediate proceedings the Board of Immigration Appeals denied the application by order entered April 18, 1963. A petition to review such an order is by statute required to be filed within six months from its date. Immigration and Nationality Act, § 106(a) (1), as added by 75 Stat. 651 (1961), 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a) (Supp. V, 1959-63). The petition to this court, vested with exclusive jurisdiction to review the order, Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 375 U.S. 217 , 84 S.Ct. 306 , 11 L.Ed.2d 281 (1963), was not filed until April 10, 1964. It is therefore untimely.

Within six months from the date of the order petitioner did petition the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for review by that court. Under stipulation the matter was there held in abeyance pending the outcome of Foti, supra, after which the Dis *448 trict Court dismissed the case. These circumstances do not authorize us to extend the period, fixed by statute, within which a petition must be filed in the court having jurisdiction to review the order.

Respondent suggests that petitioner is not remediless, since, it is said, the issue he would have us decide can be raised in habeas corpus proceedings should petitioner be taken in custody for purposes of deportation. Whether or not this suggestion is sound we are not called upon to decide in this case.

Dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1965: 11969: 11970: 119652026peak 1965 · 1

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Foti v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 375 U.S. 217 (1963) 310

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list