TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Muse v. Mellin

Clarence Muse and Mills Music, Inc. v. Robert Mellin, Robert Music Corporation, Sherwin Music, Inc. And American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers

Muse v. Mellin, 339 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1964)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · U.S. Courts of Appeals
Decided
December 29, 1964
Docket
No. 28156
Citations
339 F.2d 888

Opinion

339 F.2d 888

Clarence MUSE and Mills Music, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Robert MELLIN, Robert Music Corporation, Sherwin Music, Inc. and American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 214.

Docket 28156.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued November 17, 1964.

Decided December 29, 1964.

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Richard H. Levet, J., dismissing the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Opinion below reported at 212 F.Supp. 315 .

Theodore R. Kupferman, New York City, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Jack M. Ginsberg, New York City, for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MEDINA and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The judgment below is affirmed on the authority of T. B. Harms Co. v. Eliscu, 2 Cir., 339 F.2d 823 , decided December 23, 1964.

2

Affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1977: 11981: 11983: 21999: 119772026peak 1983 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stepdesign, Inc. v. Research Media, Inc.442 F. Supp. 32 (S.D.N.Y. 1977)
  2. Michael J. Topolos v. Jeffrey Caldewey, an Individual Dba Vintage Image, Robert Titus, Richard Paul Hinkle, an Individual and Does I Through M698 F.2d 991 (9th Cir. 1983)
  3. Kamakazi Music Corp. v. Robbins Music Corp.522 F. Supp. 125 (S.D.N.Y. 1981)
  4. Peay v. Morton571 F. Supp. 108 (M.D. Tenn. 1983)
  5. Durgom v. Janowiak87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 619 (1999)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 2

DepthCaseCited by
T. B. Harms Co. v. Eliscu, 339 F.2d 823 (2d Cir. 1964) 343
Muse v. Mellin, 212 F. Supp. 315 (S.D.N.Y. 1962) 22

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list