William Olney v. The State of Ohio
William OLNEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. the STATE OF OHIO, Respondent-Appellee
Opinion
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court dismissing Appellant’s petition for a declaratory judgment because of lack of jurisdiction. The appeal was ordered submitted on briefs without oral argument.
In his petition Appellant sought a determination by the District Court of the validity of the sentence which he received in the state court upon his conviction of the offense of murder in the second degree. Appellant does not question the validity of his conviction, only of the sentence. In our judgment, in order to correct an alleged incorrect sentence Appellant’s remedy is in the court in which he was convicted. No constitutional question is involved.
The District Court lacked jurisdiction to consider the petition for declaratory judgment. Forsythe v. State of Ohio, 333 F.2d 678 (C.A.6, 1964).
Affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 9 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
- Lingo v. State
- United States of America ex rel. Barney P. Bennett v. People of the State of Illinois
- Sam Reed Scruggs v. C. Murray Henderson, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary
- Richard C. Ruip v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Clausell v. Turner
- Hollis Morton v. Harry S. Avery, Commissioner, Department of Correction, State of Tennessee
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.